Hostile Review: George Soros’ Shadow Party and the “Paranoid Style”

“I often think that if Richard Hofstadter were still alive, he would never stop throwing up,” declares blogger Scott McLemee, thus concluding a lean and artless rant against our forthcoming book The Shadow Party.

Reviewer: “One of the scariest things I have read in a long time.”

The Discerning Texan heartily endorses The Shadow Party.

Shadow Party, Shadow Government

Wikipedia defines the term “shadow government” as “a `government-in-waiting’ that remains in waiting with the intent to take control of the government in response to some event.” (1) (hat tip, Red Hot Cuppa Politics). I’d say that pretty well sums up the thesis of our forthcoming book The Shadow Party.

Reviewer: The “Stalinesque” Shadow Party

“Although I’m averse to conspiracy theories, the Horowitz account [of George Soros’ Shadow Party] is certainly consistent with the public record. … It might be time to pay heed to that old radical, David Horowitz,” writes James Lewis at The American Thinker. (1) Having read Bill Steigerwald’s recent interview with Mr. Horowitz in the Salem, […]

Horowitz Rebuts Media Matters

Responding to Media Matters’ Wednesday attack on our book The Shadow Party (1), my esteemed co-author David Horowitz writes, “Their `review’ of The Shadow Party consists of 7,000 plus words of distortions, misrepresentations, fabrications and tendentious guilt-by-associations, without the slightest effort made to understand the book or reflect seriously on the information it provides.” (2)